The beauty of heaven is not only discerned synchronically in the structure of heaven’s society, but also diachronically in its unfolding history. According to Edwards, heaven’s history progresses as God’s attributes shine forth more brilliantly ad extra. The more heaven participates in God’s attributes, the more beautiful it becomes. Heaven’s history originates in the divine disposition to communicate his inner fullness externally, develops in accordance with the progressive revealing of Jesus Christ, and has as its mechanism the visio Dei or the beautific vision. We will examine each of these.
Animating heaven’s history in the thought of Jonathan Edwards is God’s disposition to communicate his internal excellencies to the created order. All that God is internally – his beauty, his holiness, his excellency – he desires to “replicate,” “repeat,” of “communicate” externally in the created order, that his glory may shine forth and grow increasingly throughout the universe.1 As God’s internal fullness is essentially Trinitarian, consisting in the infinite knowledge of his own excellencies (the Logos of God, God the Son) and in the infinite love that arises between he and his infinite knowledge (the Agape of God, the Holy Spirit), so too shall be the external effulgence of that fullness, consisting in the dual communication of God’s knowledge and love (Word & affection; Son & Spirit) to the creature.2 Created history, and especially the history of heaven, will thus advance according to the progressive revealing of God’s knowledge (namely, God the Son) in the love of the Holy Spirit. We see this “son-centered” history unfold in several ways: in the fall of angels & angels’ trial, in the main demarcations of heaven’s history, and in the beautific vision.
Writing about the period shortly after the creation of heaven and the angels, Edwards surmised that it must have been “made known to the angels at their first creation that they were to be ministering spirits to men, and to serve the Son of God in that way, by ministering to them as those that were peculiarly beloved of him: because … this was the end of their creation.”3 Ironically, this announcement was followed by the fall of the reprobate angels. As the highest and brightest of all the angelic community, Lucifer, out of pride, could not bear the thought of becoming a ministering spirit “to the race of mankind that he had seen newly created, that appeared so feeble, mean and despicable, [and] so vastly inferior … to him.… This occasioned his fall, and now he with the other angels he drew away with him are fallen.”4 Fear gripped the remaining angels, seeing that the best of their own could fall, and they were consequently placed under a probationary period where their fidelity to God, to His Son, and to God’s people would be tested. This testing lasted for centuries prior to the incarnation, yet found its greatest trial in their unwavering fidelity to Christ throughout his earthly ministry where he appeared in the form of sinful flesh, was born in a stable, lived in “beggarly circumstances,” and submitted to the ignominious death on the cross.5 Thus interestingly, the announcement of the gospel to the heavenly host had a negative effect upon its history, introducing sin into the created order, yet setting up the conditions for a more glorious “redemption” later whereby God’s holy attributes could shine forth more clearly.
For Edwards, two significant events stand out in heaven’s history which propel it to such greater heights of blessedness that one can conclude that a new age has dawned in heaven. The first is the ascension of the resurrected Christ to heaven where he visibly takes the throne of the upper world as the God-Man. Having purchased redemption for the church in the lower world, Edwards argues that at Christ’s ascension he similarly brought eternal life and redemption to those of the upper world, namely the angels who remained faithful to him and to his heavenly Father.6 A parallelism thus obtains between the histories of these two worlds, a point he demonstrates by his exegesis of several texts. As Christ brought salvation to the church in his “descent” to earth, so too did he “fill all things” in his “ascent” to heaven, conceivably bringing reconciliation to the elect angels (Eph 4.10).7 As Christ was the bread of life for the world (this world), so too is he the bread of angels whereby they have eternal life (John 6.33 with a typological reading of Psalm 78.25).8 Thus, while angels have no need for salvation from sin, they do need to be visibly brought into the orbit of Christ’s purposes of bringing all things under his rule. They need Christ as their bread of life. This is accomplished, Edwards argues, by Christ bestowing upon them a security of perseverance at his enthronement in heaven, whereby they no longer are able to sin and fall away from God. This “confirmation” of the angels is how angels find “reconciliation” in Christ (Col 1.20).
Here we may take occasion to observe the sweet harmony that there is between God’s dispensations, and particularly the analogy and agreement there is between his dealings with the angels and his dealings with mankind: that though one is innocent and the other guilty, the one having eternal life by a covenant of grace, the other by a covenant of works, yet both have eternal life by his Son Jesus Christ God-man; and both, though different ways, by the humiliation and sufferings of Christ, the one as the price of life, the other as the greatest and last trial of their steadfast and persevering obedience.9
In this act of confirmation heaven is further beautified by the final removal of the fear of falling away from the angelic community.
Redeemed human beings also populate heaven. When we turn to Edwards’s understanding of the human saints in heaven, we realize that they too are constantly growing in their knowledge and love of God, and thereby contribute to the growing beauty of heaven. The means by which they partake of this growth is by their spiritual sight of God, which has typically been termed the “beautific vision” in Christian theology.10 Edwards argues that the heavenly saints see God, not directly through their physical eyes (that can never be), but indirectly through seeing him manifested in his great works. “So far as they see God and know him in his works (which is the principle way in which God manifests himself …) they see and know [him] as he manifests himself in the work of redemption, which [is] the greatest and most glorious of all God’s works, the work of works to which all God’s works are reduced.”11 It is in viewing this work that they come to the highest knowledge of God. While elect angels possess great insight into the things of God, their knowledge merely consists of God’s natural attributes (his power, greatness, and order). Such knowledge does not represent the greatest knowledge of God there is to be known: namely, the supernatural knowledge of his grace, his mercy, all perceived in the grand narrative of the history of redemption. Put simply, knowledge of God as Savior speaks more of the riches of who God is than merely knowing him as supreme governor (as the angels do). Saints know of God, and “see” God in two ways: by experiencing his salvation from sin themselves in Christ, and by watching this great work commence further in the world. Hence, the heavenly saints must see God’s work of redemption on earth in order to see more of him. How this works, Edwards does not know; that it happens, he is certain of: “the SAINTS IN HEAVEN,” he writes, “see what comes to pass in the CHURCH ON EARTH.”12 By virtue of their mystical union with Christ, Edwards argues that, “What he sees of the church of God on earth, and of the flourishing of religion here, they see according to their capacity. What he sees of the punishment of his enemies in hell, they see in him.”13 Thus throughout the centuries, the heavenly saints have observed with ever increasing joy the growth of God’s redemption – seeing God in the Exodus, the establishment of David’s throne, the advent of Christ, the day of Pentecost, and on through the days of Constantine, the Reformation, and the great revivals current in his day.14
To sum up, we see that for Edwards heaven’s beauty is for the most part historical in nature, centered on the increasing communication of the knowledge and love God in the person of Jesus Christ. It originates in the God’s eternal disposition to communicate his internal Trinitarian fullness ad extra, commences with the announcement that in the future heaven shall be subject to the God-Man, advances to increasing levels of blessedness as Christ’s glory increases, and culminates for redeemed humanity in the beatific vision.
1. The topic of God’s “dispositional ontology” has attracted much attention in recent years by Edwards scholars, the work by Sang Hyun Lee being the most detailed. See his monograph, The Philosophical Theology of Jonathan Edwards, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988; revised edition, Princeton, 2000). The best place to read Edwards himself on the topic is in his Dissertation I. Concerning the End for Which God Created the World, in The Works of Jonathan Edwards, vol. 8, Ethical Writings, ed. Paul Ramsey (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), 403–536.↑
2. For the Trinitarian character of this dispositional communication, see “Miscellanies” Nos. 448, 1066, 1082, 1084, 1094, and 1142. See also chapter 3 of my study Communion in the Spirit: The Holy Spirit as the Bond of Union in the Theology of Jonathan Edward, (Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster, 2006), 59–73.↑
3. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 939, in Works, 20:198.↑
4. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 936, in Works, 20:191.↑
5. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 664b corollary 8, in Works, 18:208.↑
6. For entries on the effect of the ascension of Christ on heaven and the confirmation of the angels, see “Miscellanies” Nos. 442, 515, 570, 591, 593, 664b, 702 corollary 4, 744, and 939.↑
7. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 744, in Works, 18:385.↑
8. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 744, in Works, 18:387.↑
9. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 744 corollary 1, in Works, 18:387–88.↑
10. For a succinct presentation of the beatific vision by Edwards, see the first doctrinal section of his sermon “The Pure in Heart Blessed,” in The Works of Jonathan Edwards, vol. 17, Sermons and Discourses, 1730–1733, ed. Mark Valeri (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 61–74.↑
11. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 777, in Works, 18:430.↑
12. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 777 corollary 2, in Works, 18:431.↑
13. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 1089, in Works, 20:469–70.↑
14. Edwards, “Miscellanies” No. 777 corollary 3, in Works, 18:432.↑


Author: Robert Caldwell (5 Articles)
Robert Caldwell is Assistant Professor of Church History at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. He received a B.A. in history and philosophy from Northwestern University, and an M.Div. and Ph.D. in historical theology from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He is author of Communion in the Spirit: the Holy Spirit as the Bond of Union in the Theology of Jonathan Edwards (Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster, 2006), and is coauthoring (with Steven M. Studebaker) a forthcoming volume entitled The Trinitarian Theology of Jonathan Edwards: Text, Context, and Application (forthcoming from Ashgate).
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.